This, surely, is why Dawkins invented the notion of the “meme”, viz.

Originally Posted by ox but the question I’m asking is do you consider religion to be of use in human survival and evolution. Or spirituality might have some benefits itself (altruism, care for the environment, etc.).I don’t know if there is any credible research into this. I think there might be something to that. Does it?

Can you provide a citation for that? In Darwinian evolution the stronger are most likely to survive Thats the sort of ignorant simplification that leads to people claiming evolution supports eugenics or bullying or capital punishment. There is nothing about “strongest” This, surely, is why Dawkins invented the notion of the “meme”, viz. a cultural equivalent to biological heredity. There is nothing about “strongest” If you don’t like strongest, would you accept the fittest are more likely to survive when faced with change to go on and multiply based on genetic advantages?There is always a battle for survival taking place and all species are transitional.Interesting how life exists in its present form is based on the past cruelty of nature in the past few billion years on this planet.Are you saying that evolution is theory but not fact?

If so, please explain why. Originally Posted by ox Originally Posted by Paleoichneum Originally Posted by ox In Darwinian evolution the stronger are most likely to survive Actually thats not what the Theory of Evolution (please note the name) says. Originally Posted by ox If you don’t like strongest, would you accept the fittest are more likely to survive when faced with change to go on and multiply based on genetic advantages?

It depends how you define “fittest”. Evolution is a fact.The theory of evolution explains how evolution takes place. Its says with simplifying to level of being wrong, that the individual that has the adaptions which provide more ability to produce lots of offspring survive . Originally Posted by zinjanthropos exchemist: Since religion is not biologically inherited and does not affect reproduction (unless you have a pogrom or something, and all that does is bump off adherents of one religion to the benefit of another), Adapting to survive (aggressive?)religion. Could religion possibly help explain why only one human species still exists?

Does religion, whatever you define it as (it need not be theistic) have some sort of placebo effect?In his latest book, Science In The Soul, Dawkins tackles this in a chapter called Science of Religion. If fabricators can make objects at the nanoscale in micro-scaffold shapes, of minimal weight and maximal strength, and scale them up to real world components, what might not be achieved? Originally Posted by ox If you accept Darwinian evolution, do you subscribe to any idea that religion is an aid to the survival of one particular human species, the Homo Sapiens?Did any other human such as Homo Neanderthals have any sort of religion, I wonder. I’d be really grateful if anyone would give me some feedback on this.

Darwin wasn’t working his idea of evolution from genes or memes, but in the God Gene Hypothesis, spirituality does have a genetic component.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God_geneIt can lead some to go to war with religion on their side and others to be pacifist.What is going on in Myanmar now is a religious philosophy, Buddhism, against a theistic religion, Islam.In Darwinian evolution the stronger are most likely to survive, and in humans it’s not just physicality.After the death of his youngest daughter, Annie, Darwin realised that we are the product of the cruelty of nature, and a god need not play a part.If memes exist they are more likely Lamarckian, but the question I’m asking is do you consider religion to be of use in human survival and evolution.If it is of no use then why has it not disappeared? I’m not sure of a good website I can go to, to read about these topics and check if I’m right or not. But it is all very speculative and I doubt there is (or can be) any good evidence for it Especially as you appear to have plucked those “definitions” out of thin air.

Originally Posted by ox In Darwinian evolution the stronger are most likely to survive Actually thats not what the Theory of Evolution (please note the name) says. Originally Posted by ox Darwin wasn’t working his idea of evolution from genes or memes, but in the God Gene Hypothesis, spirituality does have a genetic component.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/God_geneIt can lead some to go to war with religion on their side and others to be pacifist.What is going on in Myanmar now is a religious philosophy, Buddhism, against a theistic religion, Islam.In Darwinian evolution the stronger are most likely to survive, and in humans it’s not just physicality.After the death of his youngest daughter, Annie, Darwin realised that we are the product of the cruelty of nature, and a god need not play a part.If memes exist they are more likely Lamarckian, but the question I’m asking is do you consider religion to be of use in human survival and evolution.If it is of no use then why has it not disappeared? Because what I’m saying to you is that evolution only discriminates on the basis of inherited characteristics that make a difference to reproductive success. Its says with simplifying to level of being wrong, that the individual that has the adaptions which provide more ability to produce lots of offspring survive . This isn’t a homework question, I’m just an independent self-studying student and don’t have a teacher to ask!Many thanks! In Darwinian evolution there is no biological mechanism by which ideas can be inherited.

I believe it did in survival… (not sure about the impact on evolution)…. but religion of the first humans is not the same as todays…. Originally Posted by Paleoichneum Originally Posted by ox In Darwinian evolution the stronger are most likely to survive Actually thats not what the Theory of Evolution (please note the name) says. Originally Posted by ox It can lead some to go to war with religion on their side and others to be pacifist. New ultrastiff, ultralight material developed — ScienceDailyA new technique for micro-3D printing permits the construction of ultra-lightweight, and ultra-stiff materials.

Originally Posted by bamberg82 https://sites.google.com/site/thephi…ofcontentment/My theory is a nice few pages, so i couldn’t post here, but i’m hoping someone would consider reading itThanks I suggest you start a religion; you might make a fortune. (You probably want to steer clear of science forums as you appear to have nothing scientific to say.) Read it;It’s not a theory.You have no idea what sex is.You have no idea what violence is.You have no idea what mental illness is.You have no idea what theory means.You have no idea what philosophy means.Basically… you have no idea.If you’re going redefine so many well-understood words then you have to justify that redefinition: we’re not going going to accept your word for it. Do you mean people need to be told ‘be fruitful and multiply’? Doesn’t occur naturally? Related Discussions:A theory of Mind and its perception of the Universethe geometry of timetime as phenomenonLuck = perception skillz?Expanding Universe Questionthe omnipresent immortalYet another theory of the universeSingularity questions – limits ofproposing dimensions we cannot perceiveInhanced Mind Perception Related Discussions:Hi to allWhat is a constitutive enzymeYeast InvertaseEnzyme lifespan, turnoverLysosomesWhere did I go wrong?enzyme kineticsCan you infer activity to a gene from surrounding genesQuestion about a sleep experimentbeta lactamase inhibitors.

Originally Posted by exchemist Since religion is not biologically inherited and does not affect reproduction (unless you have a pogrom or something, and all that does is bump off adherents of one religion to the benefit of another), there is no reason to think it would disappear. There is some evidence that religiosity is heritable (partly, as with all these things).And I think one could come up with reasons why that might improve survival – perhaps engendering greater altruism or stronger sense of group identity. Could religion possibly help explain why only one human species still exists?

Does religion, whatever you define it as (it need not be theistic) have some sort of placebo effect?In his latest book, Science In The Soul, Dawkins tackles this in a chapter called Science of Religion. Moved. Religion has had its own evolution too… There is nothing about “strongest” If you don’t like strongest, would you accept the fittest are more likely to survive when faced with change to go on and multiply based on genetic advantages?There is always a battle for survival taking place and all species are transitional.Interesting how life exists in its present form is based on the past cruelty of nature in the past few billion years on this planet.Are you saying that evolution is theory but not fact? If so, please explain why.

Related Discussions:Genesis of the Nov 4 MiracleOpen question for all scientistsquestion: if supposily “GOD” was to stand before.New ‘miracle’ materialsDesign A Sub-light Spaceship DriveWill a atheist believe if god sends sign to him 2!What is a miracle to science?Radiometric DatingGenetics and MathMiracle Marijuana! An aerogel that is able to support as much weight as an object of the same volume and shape made of solid rubber discount essay writing service
. Its says with simplifying to level of being wrong, that the individual that has the adaptions which provide more ability to produce lots of offspring survive . But a hereditary adaptation? How the hell do you work that out? Or they can survive because they are associated with some other beneficial trait (e.g. sickle cell disease, or the idea that mental illness is associated with creativity). exchemist: Since religion is not biologically inherited and does not affect reproduction (unless you have a pogrom or something, and all that does is bump off adherents of one religion to the benefit of another), Adapting to survive (aggressive?)religion. If you accept Darwinian evolution, do you subscribe to any idea that religion is an aid to the survival of one particular human species, the Homo Sapiens?Did any other human such as Homo Neanderthals have any sort of religion, I wonder.

He finds no evidence but mulls over a possible placebo effect.In the history of religious wars does the stronger group become the more likely victors with the knowledge of God on their side? It seems to me pretty hard to ascribe an evolutionary explanation to any aspect of human culture, religion included. Or am I wrong?

Is it perhaps more complicated than that? Thank you He finds no evidence but mulls over a possible placebo effect.In the history of religious wars does the stronger group become the more likely victors with the knowledge of God on their side? If memes exist they are more likely Lamarckian, but the question I’m asking is do you consider religion to be of use in human survival and evolution.If it is of no use then why has it not disappeared?

Traits don’t have to be useful to survive, it can just be that they are not negative and don’t get eliminated. I think there might be something to that. But that is not a Darwinian idea. https://sites.google.com/site/thephi…ofcontentment/My theory is a nice few pages, so i couldn’t post here, but i’m hoping someone would consider reading itThanks amount of product produced)/timeAlso, how can I use an enzyme solution (labeled ‘enzyme solution 100%’) and water to produce a number of different dilutions? If I am asked to make up 10cm^3 of each concentration, what would I be expected to do to make these dilutions?Would it be a matter of mixing say 8cm^3 of enzyme solution and 2cm^3 of water for an 80% concentration, 6cm^3 enzyme solution and 4cm^3 for a 60% concentration, 4cm^3 enzyme solution and 6cm^3 water for a 40% concentration etc.

Are you saying that evolution is theory but not fact? If so, please explain why. Since religion is not biologically inherited and does not affect reproduction (unless you have a pogrom or something, and all that does is bump off adherents of one religion to the benefit of another), there is no reason to think it would disappear.

This entry was posted in EssayHelpForHire. Bookmark the permalink.